Hello, good to be back and all that. Haven't got a lot to blog on a personal level so I thought I'd round up a few news stories that caught the eye.
ISP Police?Firstly the
Evil Lord Voldermort (or Peter
Mandleson as he's know to some) is launching his 'three-strikes and you're out' policy on
internet filesharing.
Btw. What is it with the Labour Government and their three-strikes?
Possession of cannabis,
asbos and now this? The postal workers should worry, (more on that later) it's their third strike today. Mandy will have them out!
Anyway back to the point, the Government's policy on
internet filesharing, no hang on, let me correct that. ILLEGAL
internet filesharing. Now this will be unpopular I'm sure, however we know it's illegal to do and just because now we face a chance of being punished for it should we moan, nope.
No, the thing we should moan about is how this is going to be policed. It isn't being controlled by the Government, or the police or even an
independent company capable of looking into the claims and sorting the wheat (sites and servers that hold thousands of illegal downloads) and the
chaff (normal people who've downloaded
Alesha's (
mmmmmm Alesha) new track from
Pirate Bay)
You see the Government is broke and can't run another department so instead it's going to be up to 'Content Owners'. So that's the film, music and
television companies to monitor and identify illegal sharers and bring it to the sharers
ISP.
Some
ISPs have already kicked off about it and Talk Talk have raised the important point that the proposal is putting forward the idea 'guilty before proven innocent', read more
hereNot that bad for you?My new favourite
Professor has published another statement about cannabis use. The amusingly named
Professor David
Nutt, (not his real photo) has said that the Government and
Jacqui Smith (surprisingly) fudged some of the data when the decided to re-classify Cannabis upwards last year, he claims that cannabis is less harmful than alcohol and that the mental health issues that everyone was screaming about last year where grossly over-exaggerated. He was quoted as saying that in order to prevent one episode of cannabis related schizophrenia
it would be necessary to prevent 5,000 men aged 20-25 from smoking it.
Wow! The government is lying to us, oh hang on,
I knew that already. Oh and
here.
Oh and just in case you think I'm using some whack-job of a Prof to justify cannabis use, David
Nutt is the Chairman of the Advisory Council on the Misuse of Drugs, the very council that helped the government formulate it's plans to begin with and works at the
centre for crime and justice studies at King's College.
A Faliure to Deliver.Oh those Postpeople, greedy aren't they, hmmm? Striking? Well that's just wrong, let's hate them.
Here's why you should support them.
They aren't striking over pay (well not entirely). Back in 2007 when the last strike was on, the
CWU negotiated the agreement and everyone went back to work.
However due to 'economic pressure'
The Child Catcher and the Royal Mail have decided to ignore that agreement and go ahead with 'rationalisation' in order to 'streamline' the company.
What does the above sentence mean to you? If your bosses said this to you what would you think?
Redundancy? Sacking? Pay cuts? Me too.
So the CWU said, look you agreed the terms under the last strike that if you were going to change the rules you would consult with us so we could lessen the impact on our members.
The Royal Mail and
Darth Vader said 'Bollocks to that. You'll take what we give you.' so the the CWU calls a strike!
OK that's a simplistic argument, but probably a version you've not heard becuase most media is reporting this as 'arsey-posties'.
Sometimes the Unions can get it right, sometimes they are a force for good and protect their members, they provide support against huge companies. I'm with the posties on this one.
A Fat TwatSome say we shouldn't really give them the oxygen of publicity, the sadly departed
Linda Smith said we shouldn't give them the oxygen of oxygen.
Regardless of you views on immigration or the EU, Nick Griffin and his tin-pot army are fascists, racists and
homophobes. Listening to much radio recently I was surprised by how many people said 'I'm not racist but I'll vote
BNP.'
Sorry but if you do vote for them you are racist, and if you really, REALLY don't believe you are racist and still vote for them then you're stupid.
Did they have a right to be on Question Time, yes. They are (sadly) a political group that has been voted into the European Parliament, the Greens get on to QT so the
BNP should too.
The BBC (despite the fact it was done over ratings) were right to go ahead, as the people who protested outside were right to protest. How can they both be right? Democracy baby, the right to shout what you
believe at the top of your lungs while a person is sat beside you shouting the exact opposite.
However, democracy can only be applied to those who do not cause harm. The
BNP do and will if they achieve any power. Don't let the veneer fool you, they are against homosexuals, Griffin
gets '
creeped out' by two guys kissing, but doesn't mind if they do it behind closed doors which does seem like a classic case of denying his own man-on-man feelings, (don't believe me check out the
second paragraph in 'early life and education'
here) he is against mixed race marriages and
believes that anyone who isn't white, despite being born in the country, is of a second class to anyone who is.
Really didn't mean to give so much space to this, but ignoring this problem won't make it go away, destroying this vile, fat reptile through debate and exposure will.
And finally
here's a cat stuck up a tree.
Ahhhhhh.
Ol'
Skool